.webp)
Section 387 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) was about putting someone in fear of death or serious injury to get something by extortion.This law covered situations where someone used the threat of serious harm to get money or property through blackmail.
It’s important to note that the IPC, which was passed in 1860, has been replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS), which started on 1 July 2024.
If there’s a case today, it should be looked at under the BNS and the current laws.
What was Section 387 IPC?
Section 387 IPC punished someone who made or tried to make another person afraid of death or serious injury to get something by extortion.
This was a more serious charge than ordinary extortion because it involved fear of serious harm or death.
In simple words, if someone intentionally made another person fear death or serious injury with the aim of getting something by extortion, their actions could fall under Section 387 IPC, provided all the required conditions are met.
Section 387 IPC: Legal Text
This part was about making or trying to make someone fear death or serious injury with the purpose of committing extortion.
The offence had two main elements: the fear of death or serious injury and the intention to commit extortion.The specific facts and evidence in each case determine if these elements are present.
What is Extortion?
Extortion happens when someone makes another person fear injury and then dishonestly gets them to give away property, valuable security, or something that can be used as security.
Extortion is different from a simple threat.The prosecution must prove all the required elements of the crime.
Punishment Under Section 387 IPC
Section 387 IPC had a punishment of imprisonment for up to seven years and a fine.
The punishment was strict because the offence involved fear of death or serious injury.
But for recent cases, it’s important to check whether the crime falls under the IPC due to transition rules or the corresponding BNS provision.
Is Section 387 IPC a Serious Offence?
Yes, Section 387 IPC was considered a serious crime because it involved using threats of death or serious injury to get something by extortion.
The seriousness of the case can depend on factors like the nature of the threat, the evidence, whether property was actually given, the relationship between the accused and the victim, communications, and other matters mentioned in the FIR.
Is Section 387 IPC Bailable or Non-Bailable?
Whether an offence is bailable or not is important for arrest and bail.
Section 387 IPC was a non-bailable and cognizable offence under the old laws.However, since the IPC has been replaced by the BNS, it’s important to check the current law for any ongoing case.
Is Section 387 IPC Cognizable?
Yes, Section 387 IPC was a cognizable offence.
That means the police could start an investigation without needing a Magistrate’s permission.For current cases, check the relevant section under the BNS and the BNSS.
Section 387 IPC and Bail
Since Section 387 IPC was non-bailable, the accused couldn’t automatically get bail.
They had to apply for bail before the appropriate court.
The court may take into account various factors when deciding on bail, such as:
- The type and severity of the accusations
- Whether there is enough initial evidence to support the case
- The person's past criminal record
- Whether they might try to influence witnesses
- Whether they might tamper with evidence
- Whether they might run away from justice
- Where the investigation is in
- How long the person has been in custody
- Other relevant situations
Each bail decision is unique and cannot be promised just because a specific section of the law is mentioned.
What Evidence Can Be Relevant in a Section 387 IPC Case?
Depending on the specific situation, the following types of evidence may be considered relevant:
- Written threats
- Messages from WhatsApp or other electronic platforms
- Audio or video recordings
- Emails
- Call records and related information
- Statements from witnesses
- CCTV footage
- Records of financial transactions
- Documents connected to the alleged extortion
- Other forms of electronic or written evidence
The acceptance and usefulness of any evidence depend on the rules of law and the situation in which it was gathered.
Difference Between Section 384 and Section 387 IPC
Section 384 IPC dealt with the punishment for extortion.
Section 387 IPC covered situations where someone was threatened with death or serious harm to pressure them into giving something for the purpose of extortion.
Thus, the type of threat is a key difference between these two sections.
What Should You Do If Section 387 IPC Is Mentioned in an FIR?
If an FIR mentions Section 387 IPC or its current equivalent, it is important to get a copy of the FIR and understand the specific charges.
A person accused of such charges should generally:
- Get a copy of the FIR and review it carefully
- Keep all relevant messages and documents safe
- Avoid throwing away or changing any evidence
- Consult a criminal lawyer as soon as possible
- Learn about the bail rules that apply
- Check if other crimes have also been listed
- Prepare a proper legal response based on the facts
Do not think that mentioning Section 387 automatically means someone is guilty.
Criminal charges must be proven through the correct legal process.
Section 387 IPC After 1 July 2024
The legal situation has changed since the IPC was replaced by the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) on 1 July 2024.
As a result, when dealing with incidents, FIRs, or prosecutions that happened after that date, the relevant BNS provision should be used instead of the old IPC section.
For older cases and ongoing legal processes, the applicable transition rules and savings provisions should also be considered.
Legal Help for Criminal Cases
If you or someone you know is accused of extortion, threats, criminal intimidation, or other serious crimes, it is important to get specific legal advice.
Unison Law Offices can help with legal guidance regarding criminal cases, bail matters, Supreme Court issues, and other related legal matters, depending on the facts and the applicable laws.
Conclusion
Section 387 IPC was a significant law that dealt with situations where someone was made to fear death or serious injury as part of an extortion attempt.
It could lead to up to seven years in prison and a fine, and it was considered a cognizable and non-bailable offense under the relevant law.
After 1 July 2024, the IPC has been replaced by the BNS.
So, the exact law that applies to a current case must be determined based on the date of the alleged crime, the FIR, and the transition rules.
Disclaimer: This article is for general information only and should not be taken as legal advice.
The application of any criminal law depends on the specific facts, evidence, and applicable law.It is important to seek advice from a qualified legal professional for individual cases.